2026-06-21T04:55:07Zhttp://doidb.wdc-terra.org/oaip/oai

oai:doidb.wdc-terra.org:70042026-06-10T10:11:43ZDOIDBDOIDB.GFZ

false4DOIDB.GFZ 10.5880/GFZ.1.3.2020.006 Finger, Nils-Peter Nils-Peter Finger 0000-0002-4407-471X GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany Kaban, Mikhail K. Mikhail K. Kaban 0000-0002-1864-2234 GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, RAS, Moscow, Russia Tesauro, Magdala Magdala Tesauro 0000-0003-3422-9375 University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands Haeger, Carina Carina Haeger 0000-0003-0075-3849 GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany Mooney, Walter D. Walter D. Mooney 0000-0002-5310-3631 US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, USA Thomas, Maik Maik Thomas GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany GFZ Data Services 2020 Sediment Density Model Crustal Model Upper Mantle Model Cratonic South America Joint Inversion Earth Remote Sensing Instruments EARTH SCIENCE > SOLID EARTH EARTH SCIENCE > SOLID EARTH > GEOMORPHIC LANDFORMS/PROCESSES > TECTONIC PROCESSES EARTH SCIENCE > SOLID EARTH > TECTONICS > EARTHQUAKES > SEISMIC PROFILE experiment > simulation > modelling > model Models/Analyses > MODELS Finger, Nils-Peter German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; FU Berlin, Berlin, Germany 2020-11 Collection 10.1093/gji/ggz574 10.5880/icgem.2015.1 10.1002/2014GC005483 http://igppweb.ucsd.edu/~gabi/rem.html 10.1029/2018jb016811 10.1093/gji/ggt095 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.01.022 10.1002/2014GC005484 10.1016/b978-0-444-53802-4.00010-5 10.1029/2020GC009307 1.0 CC BY 4.0 In Finger et al. (2021), we created consistent three dimensional models in terms of temperature, density and composition of the upper mantle of the cratonic South American Platform ("Upper MAntle Model") by combining seismic (Celli et al., 2020, Schaeffer & Lebedev, 2013) and gravity (Förste et al., 2014) data with mineral physics constraints in an iterative integrated inversion approach (Kaban et al., 2014; Tesauro et al., 2014). We further compiled a new crustal model ("Crustal Model"), including sediment and average crustal density and depth to the Moho to correct the gravity field for crustal effects and calculate the residual topography. To obtain these models we used data from the GSC (Global Seismic Catalog, Mooney, 2015 with updates up to 2019). To calculate depth to the Moho, the GSC data were combined with those published by Rivadeneyra-Vera et al. (2019). Here, we share the initial and final models of the upper mantle, sediment density and crust that are discussed in the article as well as the test cases set up in the uncertainty assessment. The upper mantle models are given in six layers centered at 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 km. All models range from -60.5°N to 15.5°N and -90.5°E to -29.5°E, except for the sediment density model (-59.5°N to 24.5°N and -99.5°E to -25.5°E) with a 1° by 1° lateral resolution. A detailed description of the respective files is given in each subfolder. All data are in ASCII format.
All included models except Sediment Density Model -90.5 -29.5 -60.5 15.5 Sediment Density Model -99.5 -25.5 -59.5 24.5 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659 336717379 Linking the deep structure of the cratons of Africa and South America by integrated geophysical modelling