2026-05-03T19:45:33Zhttp://doidb.wdc-terra.org/oaip/oaioai:doidb.wdc-terra.org:362016-11-25T15:10:53ZDOIDBDOIDB.SDDBfalse3DOIDB.SDDB
10.1594/GFZ.SDDB.1033
Demory, Francois
Oberhänsli, Hedi
Nowaczyk, Norbert
Gottschalk, Matthias
Wirth, Richard
Naumann, Rudolf
Downcore variations of rock magnetic parameters (ARM, S-ratio and HIRM) for CON01-603-2 and VER98-1-14
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
2006
Vereshchagin 98 Expedition
Vereshchagin Long Cores Expedition 2001
R/V Vereshchagin
anhysteretic remanent magnetisation
calculation
high isothermal remanent magnetisation
s-ratio
stepwise demagnetisation
DC-SQUID 755 SRM
2006-09-15
eng
Dataset
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.11.010
255 Datapoints
text/tab-separated-values
No significant HIRM change is observed at the transition between oxidising and reducing conditions in the sediment (Fig. 9A). This implies that HIRM is not affected by redox conditions and further confirms that the “hard” magnetic mineral content is the best tracer of detrital input (Peck et al., 1994). On the other hand, the S-ratio seems to be related to the redox conditions in the sediment (see Section 7.2). The ARM has also to be considered with caution as it is mainly influenced by the ferrimagnetic contribution, which is itself influenced by post depositional processes. This is seen in Fig. 9 where ARM variations are partly influenced by S-ratio variations.
53.523 107.9694 53.9632 108.9139