2026-05-14T07:44:11Zhttp://doidb.wdc-terra.org/oaip/oaioai:doidb.wdc-terra.org:1102016-11-25T15:11:05ZDOIDBDOIDB.SDDBfalse3DOIDB.SDDB
10.1594/GFZ.SDDB.1047
Rioual, Patrick
Mackay, Anson
Diatom valve concentration in wet sediment, diatom frustule accumulation rate and biovolume accumulation rate in dry sediment plotted against an age scale for CON-01-603-2
Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
2006
Vereshchagin Long Cores Expedition 2001
R/V Vereshchagin
age (calendar years)
benthic diatoms
calculation
Chrysophyte concentration (dry)
Chrysophyte cysts concentration (wet)
diatom cell concentration (dry)
diatom valve concentration (dry)
diatom valve concentration (wet)
dry bulk density
dry influx (Chrysophyte)
dry influx (diatom)
dry mass accumulation rate
influx of benthic diatom
particle count
sediment accumulation rate
sediment accumulation rate (bottom up)
water content
weight
microscope
2006-09-15
eng
Dataset
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.08.002
2235 Datapoints
text/tab-separated-values
At both sites, the lowest dry bulk density values (ca. 0.40 g cm−3) correspond to intervals with high diatom concentrations and high sediment accumulation rate. By contrast, the top and bottom of the sections analysed, rich in clay minerals, have high dry bulk density but low diatom concentration and sedimentation rate (Fig. 3).
53.9535 108.9129 53.9632 108.9139